GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1485not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.23no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameR350GF114
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)24 September 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data336
Core clock speed380 MHz779 MHz
Number of transistors117 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate3.04043.62
Floating-point processing powerno data1.046 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs856
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1280 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed340 MHz1002 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.76 GB/s128.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 24 September 2011
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1280 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 160 Watt

ATI 9800 PRO has 240.4% lower power consumption.

GTX 460 v2 ES, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 PRO and GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Radeon 9800 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 59 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 16 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9800 PRO or GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.