GeForce GT 720 OEM vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1486not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.23no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameR350GK107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)29 October 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed380 MHz993 MHz
Number of transistors117 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.04015.89
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3813 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs816
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed340 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.76 GB/s28.51 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 29 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 50 Watt

ATI 9800 PRO has 6.4% lower power consumption.

GT 720 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 PRO and GeForce GT 720 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Radeon 9800 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 OEM
GeForce GT 720 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 59 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce GT 720 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9800 PRO or GeForce GT 720 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.