Radeon 890M vs ATI 9800 PRO MAXX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated296
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data100.00
ArchitectureR300 (2005−2008)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameR350Strix Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data15 July 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed380 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2900 MHz
Number of transistors117 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)94 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.040185.6
Floating-point processing powerno data5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs864
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed680 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth21.76 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 94 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 890M has a 3650% more advanced lithography process, and 526.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX and Radeon 890M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 890M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX
Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 209 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX or Radeon 890M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.