RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.96
ArchitectureR300 (2005−2008)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameR350no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed380 MHzno data
Number of transistors117 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)94 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate3.040no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed680 MBps16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.76 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 94 Watt 115 Watt

ATI 9800 PRO MAXX has 22.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX
Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 18 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.