GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 vs ATI Radeon 9700

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1490not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.27no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameR300Crush11
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)4 June 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed275 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors110 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.2000.7
ROPs82
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 4x
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsFloppyno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth17.28 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)7.0
OpenGL2.01.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 4 June 2001
Chip lithography 150 nm 180 nm

ATI 9700 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9700 and GeForce2 MX + nForce 420. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9700
Radeon 9700
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 420
GeForce2 MX + nForce 420

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9700 or GeForce2 MX + nForce 420, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.