GeForce 9100M G mGPU vs ATI Radeon 9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1499not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.27no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameR300C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8
Core clock speed275 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors110 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate2.2003.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0176 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsFloppyno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth17.28 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 150 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 12 Watt

9100M G mGPU has an age advantage of 6 years, a 131% more advanced lithography process, and 208% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9700 and GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9700 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9700 or GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.