Radeon HD 8210E vs ATI 9700 PRO X4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1312
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.94
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameR300Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)23 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed325 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors110 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data9 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600 ×42.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs8 ×44
TMUs8 ×48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MB ×4System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×4System Shared
Memory clock speed310 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s ×4no data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

HD 8210E has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9700 PRO X4 and Radeon HD 8210E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9700 PRO X4 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8210E is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9700 PRO X4 or Radeon HD 8210E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.