Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.89
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameR300TU104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed325 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors110 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600 ×4220.8
Floating-point processing powerno data7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs8 ×464
TMUs8 ×4160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB ×48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×4256 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s ×4416.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DVINo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

RTX 4000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9700 PRO X4 and Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9700 PRO X4 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4
Radeon 9700 PRO X4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 26 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9700 PRO X4 or Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.