Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.22
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameR300GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed325 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1404 MHz
Number of transistors110 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600 ×4157.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs8 ×464
TMUs8 ×4112
L1 Cacheno data672 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIMXM-B (3.0)
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB ×46 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×4192 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s ×4168.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm

P3200 Max-Q has an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9700 PRO X4 and Quadro P3200 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9700 PRO X4 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4
Radeon 9700 PRO X4
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 26 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9700 PRO X4 or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.