GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon 9600 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1509not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.43no data
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV350G84
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2003 (22 years ago)21 September 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed400 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors60 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60010.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0928 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz1008 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s32.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 21 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 75 Watt

ATI 9600 PRO has 316.7% lower power consumption.

8600 GTS Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9600 PRO and GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9600 PRO
Radeon 9600 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 78 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9600 PRO or GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.