GeForce FX 5200 LE vs ATI Radeon 9550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1513not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRV350NV34 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2003 (21 years ago)17 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors60 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate1.0001.000
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount64 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)9.0a
OpenGL2.01.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 17 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm

ATI 9550 has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5200 LE, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9550 and GeForce FX 5200 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9550
Radeon 9550
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 LE
GeForce FX 5200 LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 59 votes

Rate Radeon 9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9550 or GeForce FX 5200 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.