Quadro 3000M X2 vs ATI Radeon 9500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1510not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.54no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameR300EXMF104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)22 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240 ×2
Core clock speed275 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors110 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate1.10018.00 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data0.432 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs440 ×2
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed270 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.28 GB/s80 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 150 Watt

ATI 9500 has 1150% lower power consumption.

3000M X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9500 and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9500 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9500
Radeon 9500
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 30 votes

Rate Radeon 9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9500 or Quadro 3000M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.