Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs ATI Radeon 9500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1453not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.51no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameR300Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed275 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors110 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.10072.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xRing Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth17.28 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

ATI 9500 has 25% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9500 and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9500 is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9500
Radeon 9500
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 28 votes

Rate Radeon 9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 187 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.