A100 SXM4 80 GB vs ATI Radeon 9500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1505not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.54no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameR300GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)16 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6912
Core clock speed275 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors110 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate1.100609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs4160
TMUs4432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount64 MB80 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed270 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.28 GB/s2,039 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL2.0N/A
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 16 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 400 Watt

ATI 9500 has 3233.3% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 127900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9500 and A100 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9500 is a desktop graphics card while A100 SXM4 80 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9500
Radeon 9500
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 30 votes

Rate Radeon 9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 68 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9500 or A100 SXM4 80 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.