Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics vs ATI 9250 PCI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRV280Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 2004 (21 years ago)23 February 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data64
Core clock speed240 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors36 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.963.976
Floating-point processing powerno data0.06362 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (6.0)
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2004 23 February 2016
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

R1E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9250 PCI and Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9250 PCI is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9250 PCI
Radeon 9250 PCI
AMD Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9250 PCI or Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.