ATI FireGL V7100 vs ATI Radeon 9200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1590not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.03no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameRV280R480
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2003 (22 years ago)1 December 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz507 MHz
Number of transistors36 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt91 Watt
Texture fill rate1.0006.084
ROPs412
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data211 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz520 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s33.28 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.19.0b (9_2)
OpenGL1.42.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 1 December 2004
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 91 Watt

ATI 9200 has 225% lower power consumption.

ATI FireGL V7100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 and FireGL V7100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200
Radeon 9200
ATI FireGL V7100
FireGL V7100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 55 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9200 or FireGL V7100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.