Radeon 890M vs ATI 9200 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1555	269
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	100.00
Architecture	Rage 7 (2001−2006)	RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code name	RV280	Strix Point
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2003 (22 years ago)	15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	1024
Core clock speed	200 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2900 MHz
Number of transistors	36 million	34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.8	185.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	4	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	AGP 8x	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	166 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	2.656 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	1.4	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	44
1440p	no data	18

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 March 2003	15 July 2024
Chip lithography	150 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	15 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---