GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ATI Radeon 9200 SE

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 9200 SE and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI 9200 SE
2003
64 MB DDR, 28 Watt
0.01

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms ATI 9200 SE by a whopping 528000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking153853
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data68.05
Power efficiency0.0218.22
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV280GA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)1 December 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4864
Core clock speed200 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors36 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8253.1
Floating-point processing powerno data16.2 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs4152
Tensor Coresno data152
Ray Tracing Coresno data38

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI 9200 SE 0.01
RTX 3060 Ti 52.81
+528000%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9200 SE 2
RTX 3060 Ti 20420
+1020900%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1144
1440p-0−180
4K-0−150

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.77
1440pno data4.99
4Kno data7.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 236
+0%
236
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 161
+0%
161
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 132
+0%
132
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 180
+0%
180
+0%
Battlefield 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200
+0%
200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 176
+0%
176
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 103
+0%
103
+0%
Battlefield 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 196
+0%
196
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 110
+0%
110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 185
+0%
185
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Dota 2 135
+0%
135
+0%
Far Cry 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+0%
173
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 274
+0%
274
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150
+0%
150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 107
+0%
107
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 103
+0%
103
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 52.81
Recency 1 March 2003 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 200 Watt

ATI 9200 SE has 614.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 528000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 SE in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 69 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16279 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9200 SE or GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.