GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs ATI Radeon 9200 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 9200 SE with GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

ATI 9200 SE
2003
64 MB DDR, 28 Watt
0.01

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q outperforms ATI 9200 SE by a whopping 341500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1566171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.0330.29
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV280TU104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed200 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1080 MHz
Number of transistors36 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8207.4
Floating-point processing powerno data6.636 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s352.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI 9200 SE 0.01
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 34.16
+341500%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9200 SE 2
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 13592
+679500%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1110
1440p-0−175
4K-0−147

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
Fortnite 121
+0%
121
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Fortnite 114
+0%
114
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
Metro Exodus 77
+0%
77
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+0%
143
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
+0%
88
+0%
Valorant 154
+0%
154
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100
+0%
100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 51
+0%
51
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dead Island 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 77
+0%
77
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80
+0%
80
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 102
+0%
102
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+0%
45
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 34.16
Recency 1 March 2003 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 80 Watt

ATI 9200 SE has 185.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 341500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 70 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 154 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9200 SE or GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.