GMA 950 vs ATI Radeon 9200 SE

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1528not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.02no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Generation 3.5 (2005)
GPU code nameRV280Lakeport
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)1 May 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed200 MHz166 MHz
Number of transistors36 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate0.80.66
ROPs41
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.19.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.42.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 1 May 2005
Chip lithography 150 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 7 Watt

GMA 950 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 SE and GMA 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop card while GMA 950 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE
Intel GMA 950
GMA 950

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 69 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 139 votes

Rate GMA 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.