Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics vs ATI 9200 SE PCI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRV280Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)28 January 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed200 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Number of transistors36 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate0.83.976
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1272 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 100 Watt

ATI 9200 SE PCI has 257.1% lower power consumption.

R2 Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 SE PCI and Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 SE PCI is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI
Radeon 9200 SE PCI
AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 9200 SE PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 61 votes

Rate Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9200 SE PCI or Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.