Radeon Vega 7 vs ATI 9200 PRO

Place in the ranking	1529	532
Place by popularity	not in top-100	18
Power efficiency	0.02	11.38
Architecture	Rage 7 (2001−2006)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	RV280	Cezanne
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	1 May 2003 (21 year ago)	13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	448
Core clock speed	239 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	36 million	9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.96	53.20
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	4	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 8x	IGP
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	164 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	5.248 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	1.4	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	22
1440p	-0−1	32
4K	-0−1	16

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.01	7.47
Recency	1 May 2003	13 April 2021
Chip lithography	150 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	45 Watt

ATI 9200 PRO has 60.7% lower power consumption.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has a 74600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.