P106M vs ATI Radeon 9200 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1525not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.02no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRV280GP106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 May 2003 (21 year ago)23 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1152
Core clock speed239 MHz1291 MHz
Number of transistors36 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate0.9692.95
Floating-point processing powerno data2.974 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs472

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed164 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.248 GB/s96.13 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 23 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 75 Watt

ATI 9200 PRO has 167.9% lower power consumption.

P106M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 PRO and P106M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop card while P106M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Radeon 9200 PRO
NVIDIA P106M
P106M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate P106M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.