GeForce RTX 5070 vs ATI Radeon 9200 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1543	23
Place by popularity	not in top-100	64
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	69.69
Power efficiency	no data	19.71
Architecture	Rage 7 (2001−2006)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code name	RV280	GB205
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 May 2003 (21 year ago)	4 March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	6144
Core clock speed	239 MHz	2325 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2512 MHz
Number of transistors	36 million	31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.96	482.3
Floating-point processing power	no data	30.87 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	80
TMUs	4	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 8x	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	no data	245 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	164 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	5.248 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video	1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	1.4	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.4
CUDA	-	10.1
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	130
1440p	no data	94
4K	no data	66

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.22
1440p	no data	5.84
4K	no data	8.32

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 May 2003	4 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	250 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---