GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI Radeon 9200 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1594252
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.60
Power efficiencyno data28.17
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV280GA107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 May 2003 (22 years ago)2 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed239 MHz1042 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1470 MHz
Number of transistors36 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate0.96105.8
Floating-point processing powerno data6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs472
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed164 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.248 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9200 PRO 2
Samples: 41
RTX 3050 6 GB 10748
+537300%
Samples: 4245

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 2 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 70 Watt

ATI 9200 PRO has 150% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 20 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 PRO and GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Radeon 9200 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2839 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9200 PRO or GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.