Tesla V100 FHHL vs ATI Radeon 9200 LE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1526not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.02no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV280GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2003 (21 year ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed250 MHz937 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1290 MHz
Number of transistors36 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000412.8
Floating-point processing powerno data13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs4320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount64 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz810 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s829.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 27 March 2018
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 250 Watt

ATI 9200 LE has 792.9% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 FHHL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 LE and Tesla V100 FHHL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 LE is a desktop card while Tesla V100 FHHL is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200 LE
Radeon 9200 LE
NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
Tesla V100 FHHL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 9 votes

Rate Tesla V100 FHHL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.