HD Graphics 12EU vs ATI Radeon 9200 LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1586not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameRV280Ironlake
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 May 2003 (22 years ago)10 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed250 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors36 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.0006.396
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1023 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xQPI
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.110.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.42.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 150 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 35 Watt

ATI 9200 LE has 25% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics 12EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 LE and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200 LE
Radeon 9200 LE
Intel HD Graphics 12EU
HD Graphics 12EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9200 LE or HD Graphics 12EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.