GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB vs ATI Radeon 9200 LE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1595not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRV280GP106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 2003 (22 years ago)27 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1280
Core clock speed250 MHz1265 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1480 MHz
Number of transistors36 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000118.4
ROPs448
TMUs480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz8008 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s192.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.44.5
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A-
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 27 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 80 Watt

ATI 9200 LE has 185.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 LE and GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 LE is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200 LE
Radeon 9200 LE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 76 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9200 LE or GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.