ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View vs ATI Radeon 9000 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV250RV620
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed275 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors36 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate1.1001.600
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x VHDCI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.110.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 32 Watt

ATI 9000 PRO has 14.3% lower power consumption.

ATI 2450 Multi-View, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9000 PRO and FirePro 2450 Multi-View. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9000 PRO is a desktop card while FirePro 2450 Multi-View is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9000 PRO
Radeon 9000 PRO
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 13 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.