RTX A4500 vs ATI Radeon 9000 LE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated69
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.24
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV250GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7168
Core clock speed250 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors36 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000369.6
Floating-point processing powerno data23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs4224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data7 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s640.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 200 Watt

ATI 9000 LE has 614.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, a 31900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9000 LE and RTX A4500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9000 LE is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9000 LE
Radeon 9000 LE
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9000 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 211 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9000 LE or RTX A4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.