ATI Radeon X800 PRO AGP vs 860M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking451not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency60.06no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameKrackan PointR420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)1 May 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed600 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate96.005.700
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs812
TMUs3212
Ray Tracing Cores8no data
L0 Cache128 KBno data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared450 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 48 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 860M and Radeon X800 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
ATI Radeon X800 PRO AGP
Radeon X800 PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 55 votes

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or Radeon X800 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.