Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs 860M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking449not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency59.09no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameKrackan PointTahiti
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)31 January 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed600 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate96.0038.40
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS1.229 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3248
Ray Tracing Cores8no data
L0 Cache128 KBno data
L1 Cache64 KB192 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared3 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data240.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 85 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 466.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 860M and Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 35 votes

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.