Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile vs Radeon 860M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking433not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency54.63no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameStrix PointTU104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)8 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123072 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate96.00293.8 ×2
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS9.4 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs864 ×2
TMUs32192 ×2
Tensor Coresno data384 ×2
Ray Tracing Cores848 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 860M and Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.