GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs Radeon 860M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking433not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency54.63no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameStrix PointGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)6 November 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121344
Core clock speed400 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz1046 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate96.00117.2
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS2.812 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs32112
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1650 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data211.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 170 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 1033.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 860M and GeForce GTX 760 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 760 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
GeForce GTX 760 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 46 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or GeForce GTX 760 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.