GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache vs Radeon 860M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking451not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency60.06no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameKrackan PointNV44 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)15 December 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed600 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate96.001.400
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs324
Ray Tracing Cores8no data
L0 Cache128 KBno data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.83.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 110 nm

Radeon 860M has a 2650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 860M and GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 74 votes

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.