Radeon RX 6650 XT vs ATI 8500 LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.44
Power efficiencyno data17.85
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameR200Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 February 2002 (23 years ago)10 May 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed250 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2635 MHz
Number of transistors60 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000337.3
Floating-point processing powerno data10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s280.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 February 2002 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 176 Watt

ATI 8500 LE has 665.2% lower power consumption.

RX 6650 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 20 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8500 LE and Radeon RX 6650 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 8500 LE
Radeon 8500 LE
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon 8500 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3993 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8500 LE or Radeon RX 6650 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.