UHD Graphics 730 vs Radeon 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 840M with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 840M
2024
10.06
+150%

840M outperforms UHD Graphics 730 by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking474725
Place by popularitynot in top-10099
Power efficiencyno data19.07
ArchitectureRDNA 3+ (2024)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameKrackan PointRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 June 2024 (less than a year ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256192
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1550 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data18.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7500 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 840M 10.06
+150%
UHD Graphics 730 4.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 840M 4003
+150%
UHD Graphics 730 1603

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+180%
10−12
−180%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 84
+180%
30−33
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Dead Island 2 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Counter-Strike 2 68
+152%
27−30
−152%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Dead Island 2 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Fortnite 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Valorant 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Counter-Strike 2 15
+150%
6−7
−150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+167%
55−60
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Dead Island 2 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Fortnite 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 32
+167%
12−14
−167%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Valorant 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Dead Island 2 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+174%
27−30
−174%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Valorant 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Dead Island 2 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Valorant 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dead Island 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

This is how Radeon 840M and UHD Graphics 730 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 840M is 180% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.06 4.03
Recency 2 June 2024 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm

Radeon 840M has a 149.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 840M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 730 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 840M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 840M
Radeon 840M
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 11 votes

Rate Radeon 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1452 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 840M or UHD Graphics 730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.