GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI vs Radeon 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking518not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)G7x (2005−2006)
GPU code nameKrackan PointG71M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)1 June 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25654
Core clock speed400 MHz14 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistorsno data556 Million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate46.40no data
Floating-point processing power1.4848 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data
Ray Tracing Cores4no data
L0 Cache64 KBno data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)GDDR3
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.4-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

Radeon 840M has a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 167% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 840M and GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 23 votes

Rate Radeon 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 840M or GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.