Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Radeon 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking515not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3+ (2024)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameKrackan PointPonte Vecchio
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 June 2024 (1 year ago)10 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25616384 ×4
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data2400 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,638 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data52.43 TFLOPS ×4
TMUsno data1024 ×4
Tensor Coresno data1024 ×4
Ray Tracing Coresno data128 ×4
L1 Cacheno data64 MB
L2 Cacheno data408 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data128 GB ×4
Memory bus widthno data8192 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed7500 MHz1565 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3,205 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2024 10 January 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm

Radeon 840M has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 840M and Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 840M is a notebook graphics card while Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 840M
Radeon 840M
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 15 votes

Rate Radeon 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 132 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 840M or Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.