A16 PCIe vs Radeon 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking518not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameKrackan PointGA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562560 ×4
Core clock speed400 MHz885 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate46.40135.6 ×4
Floating-point processing power1.4848 TFLOPS8.678 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs848 ×4
TMUs1680 ×4
Tensor Coresno data80 ×4
Ray Tracing Cores420 ×4
L0 Cache64 KBno data
L1 Cache64 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1812 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data231.9 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.41.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

Radeon 840M has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 840M and A16 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 840M is a notebook graphics card while A16 PCIe is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 20 votes

Rate Radeon 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 444 votes

Rate A16 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 840M or A16 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.