Arc Graphics 32EU vs Radeon 820M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 676 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) | Xe2-LPG (2024) |
| GPU code name | Krackan Point | Arrow Lake |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | March 2025 (1 year ago) | 24 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1950 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 22.40 | 31.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7168 TFLOPS | 0.9984 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | 16 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 2 | no data |
| L0 Cache | 32 KB | no data |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Motherboard Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Radeon 820M has 333% lower power consumption.
Arc Graphics 32EU, on the other hand, has a 33% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon 820M and Arc Graphics 32EU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon 820M is a notebook graphics card while Arc Graphics 32EU is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
