Radeon Pro W6300M vs 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking98not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency58.47no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameStrix HaloNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed1295 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate373.697.92
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16048
Ray Tracing Cores4012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared32 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2025 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 25 Watt

Radeon 8060S has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

Pro W6300M, on the other hand, has 120% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8060S and Radeon Pro W6300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6300M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M
Radeon Pro W6300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 40 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Radeon Pro W6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.