Radeon R4 Graphics vs 8050S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency52.76no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameStrix HaloBeema
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)11 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048128
Core clock speed1295 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate298.96.400
Floating-point processing power9.564 TFLOPS0.2048 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1288
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.86.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2025 11 June 2014
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 8050S has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

R4 Graphics, on the other hand, has 266.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8050S and Radeon R4 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8050S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R4 Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Radeon R4 Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 1365 votes

Rate Radeon R4 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or Radeon R4 Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.