ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 LE vs Radeon 8050S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency54.15no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameStrix HaloRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)26 January 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1295 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed2800 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate358.41.000
Floating-point processing power11.47 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1284
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L2 Cache8 MBno data
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)8.1
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2025 26 January 2004
Chip lithography 4 nm 150 nm

Radeon 8050S has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 3650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8050S and All-In-Wonder 9200 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8050S is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder 9200 LE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or All-In-Wonder 9200 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.