Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs 760M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking426not rated
Place by popularity82not in top-100
Power efficiency66.27no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code namePhoenixNavi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2024 (2 years ago)13 April 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124480
Core clock speed800 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate83.17707.0
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs32280
Ray Tracing Cores870
L0 Cache128 KB2.2 MB
L1 Cache128 KB2 MB
L2 Cache2 MB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2024 13 April 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 281 Watt

Radeon 760M has an age advantage of 9 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1773% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 760M and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 509 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 760M or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.