Radeon Instinct MI200 vs 760M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking421not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency66.74no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code namePhoenixAldebaran
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2024 (1 year ago)December 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126656
Core clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate83.17707.2
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs16no data
TMUs32416
Ray Tracing Cores8no data
L0 Cache128 KBno data
L1 Cache128 KB1.6 MB
L2 Cache2 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,638 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 760M and Radeon Instinct MI200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI200
Radeon Instinct MI200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 429 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 11 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 760M or Radeon Instinct MI200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.