HD Graphics 12EU vs Radeon 760M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking352not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3 (2022−2023)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code namePhoenixIronlake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51296
Core clock speed1500 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed2800 MHzno data
Number of transistors25,390 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)35 Watt
Texture fill rate67.206.396
Floating-point processing power4.301 gflops0.1023 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8QPI
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.1
Shader Model6.74.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2023 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 4 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 35 Watt

Radeon 760M has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 12EU, on the other hand, has 54.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 760M and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a notebook card while HD Graphics 12EU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
Intel HD Graphics 12EU
HD Graphics 12EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 143 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 17 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.