GMA 3600 vs ATI Radeon 7500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1520not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.03no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameRV200Cedarview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 August 2001 (23 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed290 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors60 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate1.7401.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs21
TMUs64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCI
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed230 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth7.36 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.010.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.3ES 2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2001 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 150 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 13 Watt

GMA 3600 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 130.8% more advanced lithography process, and 76.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7500 and GMA 3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7500 is a desktop card while GMA 3600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7500
Radeon 7500
Intel GMA 3600
GMA 3600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 46 votes

Rate Radeon 7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 23 votes

Rate GMA 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.