FireStream 9270 vs ATI Radeon 7500 LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated798
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.54
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV200RV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 August 2001 (24 years ago)13 November 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data800
Core clock speed250 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors60 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate1.50030.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs640
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed175 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.6 GB/s115.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2001 13 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 160 Watt

ATI 7500 LE has 596% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9270, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 173% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7500 LE and FireStream 9270. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7500 LE is a desktop graphics card while FireStream 9270 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 7500 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 7500 LE or FireStream 9270, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.