Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient vs ATI 7200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1600not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR100Raven
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2000 (25 years ago)23 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data704
Core clock speed166 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors30 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate155.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.76 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2000 23 April 2018
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 35 Watt

ATI 7200 has 52.2% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 11 Efficient, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7200 and Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 19 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 7200 or Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.